×
Energy Savers
Wide Bay Burnett

Bundaberg Sugar Cane & Macadamia Nut Farm

Implemented
26
Energy Savings
13.1
Savings
8,829
Industry
Cane
Irrigation
Travelling Gun, Flood
Pumps
Centrifugal
Technology
Solar pumping
Capital Cost
$41,939

Summary

A recent energy audit showed how improving the current systems can lead to energy and cost savings. The recommendations explored in the audit included the replacement of pump, motor, and installation of VFD at pump one, installation of Solar PV at pump one, and conversion to Tariff 33 at all pumps.

The farmer has installed the solar PV system. Savings will be updated when the measurement and verification process is complete.

A sugar cane and future macadamia farming enterprise located in Bundaberg could benefit from a recent Energy Savers Audit. Farming requires constant decision-making to maximise production and profit. Often irrigation systems are out of date and are in need of replacement to incorporate new technologies and updated knowledge.

The total area of cropping lands consists of 82 ha and is divided into three sectors that are serviced by four pumps, whit only three being included in this proposal. The current pumping systems service two sections of the farm through interconnecting underground mainline. These sections are mostly utilised for sugarcane production while an area to the north of the sugarcane fields is being developed as a macadamia nut orchard.

Pump site one services 35 ha of sugarcane with travelling gun and gravity feed furrow methods. While the incoming pressure is adequate to irrigate much of this area through gravity feed furrow irrigation, when supplying the travelling gun, a pressure management gate valve is used on the distribution side of the pump to enable the restricted operation to maintain pressure. Pump two is only used occasionally to support the main irrigation system and to irrigate the developing macadamia nut orchard. The site has historically been connected to tariff 66 which includes a fixed monthly charge based on motor size and when use is limited this charge can present a significant portion of the account. Finally, pump three services 20 ha of sugarcane with low-pressure hand shift sprinklers and trickle irrigation. It has a low capacity motor that draws an average of 10 kW/hr delivering irrigation at 115 kWh per ML of water pumped. None of the pumps is currently connected to tariff 33.

Energy consumption from the site of the pump showed that a total 61,387kWh at a cost of $21,228 was used during the 2018-2019 period. A recent energy audit showed how improving the current systems can lead to energy and cost savings. The recommendations explored in the audit included:

  • The replacement of 37kW pump, motor, and installation of Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) at pump one. Energy demand will decline as the VFD will manage factors related to incoming water delivery pressure fluctuation, providing the potential for sustainability of current levels of high productivity.
  • Installation of a 30kW Solar PV at pump one to reduce grid energy demand for pumping.
  • Conversion to Tariff 33 at all pumps.

Table 1. Energy savings from audit recommendations

Recommendations Annual Energy Savings (kWh) Annual Cost Savings ($) Emission Savings (tCO2-e)  Capital Cost ($) Payback Period (years)
Pump upgrade and install VFD 17,950 5,645 14.5 16,018 2.8
Solar Pump 16,160 8,829 13.1 41,939 4.8
Change to Tariff 33 6,410 7,500 1.1
Total 34,110 20,884 27.6 65,457 3.0

 

With all pumps connected to Tariff 33 and water use similar to that required for the 2019 crop, operating cost at pump one when combined with pumps two ($962) and three ($2,348) will result in an annual cost of $4,560. This will lower the annual estimated cost of irrigation for each tonne of cane produced to $0.56/tc.

The farmer proceeded with the implementation of the 30 kW solar PV system, with potential energy consumption savings of 26%, costs savings of 32%, and carbon emission savings of 13.1 tCO2-e per year. Actual savings will be updated once the measurement and verification process is complete.

Table 2. Pre and post audit energy consumption, costs, and energy productivity savings

Metric  Pre-Audit  Post-Audit  Reduction (%)
Energy Consumption (kWh) 61,387 45,277 26
Cost ($)  21,228 12,399 32
Energy Productivity (kWh/ha) 749 552 26


An energy audit is a good investment
 

An energy audit is a great first step in moving a business towards a more efficient future by reducing energy use, costs, and carbon emissions on site.  

An energy auditor will review your past energy bills, your equipment, and the way your business operates. They’ll show you where you’re using excess energy and explain what you can do about it. Find out about what’s involved in an energy audit HERE. 

See our range of agricultural energy efficiency case studies HERE and Subscribe to our bi-monthly energy e-news HERE  

If you have any energy efficiency related questions for the team get in touch at energysavers@qff.org.au.  

The Energy Savers Plus Extension Program is delivered by the Queensland Farmers Federation with support and funding from the Queensland Department of Energy and Public Works. 

 Capture

 

Download The Full Case Study
Want to keep a copy or print the case study?
Download Now